Medium

New Rubber Plant Investment

The federal government of a foreign country is investigating whether to reopen a rubber factory in a western part of the country. The factory was operational in the past but has not been used for 7 …

Estimated Time 33 minutes
Difficulty Medium
Source Darden
52 / 100
The federal government of a foreign country is investigating whether to reopen a rubber factory in a western part of the country. The factory was operational in the past but has not been used for 7 years; it was closed due to terrorism in the area, and if rejuvenated it may become a target for the rebels. All the equipment is usable, but the government would need to spend $12M on upgrades, which would allow the plant to produce 10M lbs of rubber per month. Demand for rubber is strong, but rubber must be transported by train to a port, and two trains a day can be used for this. Should the government reopen the plant?
Mock Interview
Interviewer

The federal government of a foreign country is investigating whether to reopen a rubber factory in a western part of the country. The factory was operational in the past but has not been used for 7 years; it was closed due to terrorism in the area, and if rejuvenated it may become a target for the rebels. All the equipment is usable, but the government would need to spend $12M on upgrades, which would allow the plant to produce 10M lbs of rubber per month. Demand for rubber is strong, but rubber must be transported by train to a port, and two trains a day can be used for this. Should the government reopen the plant?

You

Thanks. Before analyzing, I'd like to clarify a few key questions...

Interviewer

Good question. Let me provide some background information...

You

Based on this, I suggest analyzing from these dimensions...

AI Score
Clarifying + Framework /5 Exhibits + Analysis /5 Brainstorm + Conclusion /5 Universal Skills /5
Practicing...
Score coming soon
AI Mock Interview

This case asks whether a foreign government should spend $12M to reopen a long-idle rubber plant, weighing pure profitability against its broader goals of job creation and economic development. It is an investment/ROI case that tests structured framework design, operations reasoning about supply-chain bottlenecks, disciplined quantitative modeling of a monthly income statement, and business judgment about commodity and security risks balanced against non-financial benefits.

Key Insights:

  1. The plant’s stated 10M lbs/month production capacity is a distractor; the real ceiling is set by outbound rail capacity, so the binding constraint must be identified before any revenue or profit figure is trusted.
  2. Both directions of the logistics chain matter, since inbound gum-resin rail capacity and outbound rubber shipping each impose their own limit, and the tighter of the two governs feasible output.
  3. A payback period that looks attractive can mask a wafer-thin operating margin, so the quality of the earnings, not just the headline ROI, drives the recommendation.
  4. Because rubber is a globally traded commodity, thin margins leave little cushion against a price dip, making commodity-price and security risk central to the decision rather than afterthoughts.
  5. The government’s success criteria extend beyond ROI to job creation and economic development, so a strong recommendation frames the marginal financials alongside these non-financial returns.

Practice More Case Interview Questions

Browse 800+ real consulting case interview examples from top firms. Filter by difficulty, company, industry, or case type. Or try our AI mock interview for instant feedback and scoring.

Train your judgment with AI